Motorola Moto E13 vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Shop Android Smartphones
Motorola Moto E13
Starting at
£62.00
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Starting at
£456.00What's the difference between the Motorola Moto E13 and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra?
Motorola Moto E13 vs Razr 40 Ultra comes down to the chipset, RAM and battery. Refurbished, the Motorola Moto E13 starts at £62, £394 less than the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra.
Refurbished from
Chipset
RAM
Battery
Screen size
Screen type
- Chipset: Unisoc T606 (12 nm) on the Motorola Moto E13, Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) on the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra.
- The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has more RAM: 8 GB vs 2 GB.
- The Motorola Moto E13 has a bigger battery: 5000 mAh vs 3800 mAh.
Motorola Moto E13 vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra specs
The Motorola Moto E13 and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra both came out in 2023 but suit different needs. The Moto E13 is designed for everyday use with a large 5000 mAh battery that supports longer use between charges and a microSDXC slot for extra storage. It has a simpler chipset and less RAM, making it a practical choice for basic tasks. The Razr 40 Ultra offers a more advanced experience with a foldable LTPO AMOLED screen, higher refresh rate, and 5G support, making it better for media and multitasking. It also comes with much more built-in storage and a faster chipset. The Moto E13 fits those wanting a straightforward, reliable phone, while the Razr 40 Ultra suits users seeking a premium, feature-rich device.
Motorola Moto E13 vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra price
Colour
- BeigeSold out
- BlackSold out
- OrangeSold out
- BlueSold out
- MagentaSold out
Storage
- 64GBSold out
- 256GBSold out
Motorola Moto E13 vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra battery life and software updates
Battery life, software updates and physical design affect how long a device stays useful day to day. These two phones differ notably in their battery capacity, update eligibility and form factor.
Battery Capacity
The Motorola Moto E13 has a 5000 mAh battery, which means it is suited for users who prioritise longer battery life and can go longer between charges. The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a 3800 mAh battery, which is smaller and fits the Razr's slimmer, foldable design.
Foldable Design
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra features a foldable design, allowing a compact form when closed and a large screen when opened. The Motorola Moto E13 has a traditional non-foldable design, providing a more standard smartphone experience.
Battery
Fast charging
Foldable
Wireless charging
Year of release
Motorola Moto E13 vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra performance
Performance depends on the chipset, RAM and storage. These determine how smoothly a phone handles apps and multitasking, and how much data and media it can hold.
Chipset Power
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra runs on a Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset built on a 4 nm process, delivering faster and more efficient performance for demanding apps and multitasking. The Motorola Moto E13 uses a Unisoc T606 chipset on a 12 nm process, which supports everyday tasks well but is less powerful.
Memory for Multitasking
With 8 GB of RAM, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra keeps multiple apps open smoothly, making it suitable for users who switch between apps frequently. The Motorola Moto E13 has 2 GB of RAM, which is enough for basic use and running fewer apps at once.
Storage Capacity
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra offers 256 GB of built-in storage, ideal for users who want to store many apps, photos, videos and files without needing extra memory. The Motorola Moto E13 provides 64 GB of built-in storage and includes a microSDXC slot for adding more storage via a memory card.
Chipset
RAM
Motorola Moto E13 vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra screen
Screen quality affects how you view content. These devices have very different screens in size, resolution, refresh rate and technology, impacting sharpness and smoothness.
Screen Size and Type
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a larger 6.9 inch foldable LTPO AMOLED screen, offering vibrant colours and deeper blacks. The Motorola Moto E13 has a 6.5 inch IPS LCD screen, which provides good visibility but with less contrast than AMOLED.
Resolution and Refresh Rate
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra's screen resolution is 1080 x 2640, delivering sharper images and text than the Moto E13's 720 x 1600 resolution. The Razr also has a 144 Hz refresh rate, making animations and scrolling appear smoother. The Moto E13 has a standard 60 Hz refresh rate.
Refresh rate
Resolution
Screen size
Screen type
Motorola Moto E13 vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra camera
Camera quality and front-facing camera resolution influence photo detail and video calling experience. Both phones have different strengths here.
Front Camera Detail
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a 32 megapixel front camera, which captures more detail for selfies and video calls. The Motorola Moto E13 has a 5 megapixel front camera suitable for basic video chats and selfies.
Main Camera
The Motorola Moto E13 has a 13 megapixel main camera, providing solid photo quality for everyday shots. The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a 12 megapixel main camera, which is close in resolution and designed to complement its other imaging features.
Front camera
Main camera
Motorola Moto E13 vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra size and design
Additional features like network support, SIM cards and size affect usability and convenience for different users.
Network and SIM Options
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra supports 5G networks for faster mobile data speeds, while the Motorola Moto E13 supports 4G. The Moto E13 offers dual physical SIM slots, useful for managing two numbers, while the Razr 40 Ultra has a single physical SIM slot.
Expandable Storage
The Motorola Moto E13 includes a microSDXC slot, allowing you to increase storage with a memory card. The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra does not have an SD card slot, so storage is fixed at the built-in capacity.
Size and Weight
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is taller at 170.8 mm and slightly heavier at 192 g, but narrower at 74 mm. The Motorola Moto E13 is 164.2 mm tall, weighs 181 g and is 75 mm wide. The Razr's thinner depth of 7 mm supports its foldable design, compared to the Moto E13's 8.5 mm thickness.
Carrier compatibility
Connector
Depth
Height
Mobile network
SD card slot
SIM card
Weight
Width
Motorola Moto E13 or Motorola Razr 40 Ultra: which should you buy?
Buy the Motorola Moto E13 if
- you want to spend less: it starts at £62, £394 less than the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
- you want a bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 3800 mAh)
- you want a higher-resolution main camera (13 megapixels vs 12 megapixels)
Buy the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra if
- you want more RAM (8 GB vs 2 GB)
- you want an OLED screen
- you want a smoother screen (165 Hz vs 60 Hz)
What our customers say
Customers say the Motorola Moto E13 feels good to use and offers strong value for a lower price. Many note the battery lasts a very long time, supporting longer use. The phone is described as working well for basic tasks, with a clean condition that feels almost like new. Some users appreciate the size and simplicity for younger or less demanding users. A few mention occasional issues with music playback or charging, but overall it is seen as a reliable everyday phone.
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra receives praise for its excellent condition and premium feel, with some customers comparing it favourably to other high-end foldables. Reviewers are impressed by the refurbishment quality and say it looks like a new phone. Users enjoy its performance and design, finding it a strong upgrade or replacement. The phone is described as doing everything expected well, with many happy to buy it again or recommend it.
The Moto E13 suits those who want a straightforward phone with good battery life and expandable storage. The Razr 40 Ultra fits users looking for a premium foldable device with a sharper screen, more memory and faster connectivity.
Motorola Moto E13 vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra FAQs
Motorola Moto E13 vs Razr 40 Ultra comes down to the chipset, RAM and battery. Chipset: Unisoc T606 (12 nm) on the Motorola Moto E13, Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) on the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra. The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has more RAM: 8 GB vs 2 GB.
The Motorola Moto E13 is cheaper refurbished, from £62 compared with £456 for the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra.
The Motorola Moto E13 has a bigger battery: 5000 mAh vs 3800 mAh.
The Motorola Moto E13 has a higher-resolution main camera: 13 megapixels vs 12 megapixels.
Refurbished, the Motorola Moto E13 comes in 64GB, and the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra in 256GB.
