Galaxy J3 (2016) vs Nokia 2.4
Shop Samsung Galaxy
Galaxy J3 (2016)
Starting at
£48.00
Nokia 2.4
Starting at
£93.00What's the difference between the Galaxy J3 (2016) and Nokia 2.4?
Galaxy J3 (2016) vs Nokia 2.4 comes down to the battery, screen size and screen type. Refurbished, the Galaxy J3 (2016) starts at £48, £45 less than the Nokia 2.4. The Nokia 2.4 is the newer model, released in 2020.
Refurbished from
Battery
Screen size
Screen type
Main camera
Front camera
- The Nokia 2.4 has a bigger battery: 4500 mAh vs 2600 mAh.
- Screen size: 5 inch on the Galaxy J3 (2016), 6,5 inch on the Nokia 2.4.
- The Galaxy J3 (2016) has an OLED screen.
Galaxy J3 (2016) vs Nokia 2.4 specs
The Galaxy J3 (2016) and Nokia 2.4 differ in screen size, camera capabilities, and storage options, making each suited to different users. The Galaxy J3 (2016) has a compact 5 inch Super AMOLED screen that suits those who prefer a smaller phone with vibrant display quality. The Nokia 2.4 offers a larger 6.5 inch IPS LCD screen for more room to watch videos or browse content. For photography, the Nokia 2.4 provides higher resolution front and main cameras, ideal for users who want clearer selfies and pictures. Storage options also vary, with the Galaxy J3 (2016) offering 8GB or 16GB, while the Nokia 2.4 comes in 32GB or 64GB, catering to those wanting more space for apps and media. Physical size and weight differ too, influencing comfort and portability preferences.
Galaxy J3 (2016) vs Nokia 2.4 price
Colour
- BlackSold out
- GoldSold out
- WhiteSold out
- PurpleSold out
- GreySold out
Storage
- 8GBSold out
- 16GBSold out
- 32GBSold out
- 64GBSold out
Galaxy J3 (2016) vs Nokia 2.4 battery life and software updates
Durability here focuses on the release year and foldability, which set a basic context for each device. Your choice depends on other factors.
Year Of Release
The Galaxy J3 (2016) was released in 2016 and the Nokia 2.4 came out in 2020. This fact provides a timeline for the devices but does not imply any advantage or disadvantage. It simply helps with context about when each device entered the market.
Battery
Foldable
Software updates
Year of release
Galaxy J3 (2016) vs Nokia 2.4 performance
Chipset
RAM
Galaxy J3 (2016) vs Nokia 2.4 screen
Screen quality affects how you view content and interact with the phone. The Galaxy J3 (2016) and Nokia 2.4 differ in size, resolution, and screen technology, shaping user experience around display clarity and size.
Screen Size
The Galaxy J3 (2016) has a 5 inch screen, which makes it compact and easy to handle with one hand. This suits users who prefer smaller phones that fit comfortably in pockets. The Nokia 2.4's 6.5 inch screen offers a larger viewing area, making it better suited for watching videos, reading, and multitasking on a bigger display.
Screen Resolution
Both devices have a 720 pixel width resolution, but the Nokia 2.4's 720 x 1600 resolution provides more vertical pixels compared to the Galaxy J3 (2016)'s 720 x 1280. This means the Nokia 2.4 screen displays more content vertically, which can be helpful for scrolling through websites or apps.
Screen Type
The Galaxy J3 (2016) uses a Super AMOLED screen, known for vibrant colours and deep blacks, making images and videos appear lively. The Nokia 2.4 uses an IPS LCD screen, which offers good colour accuracy and wide viewing angles. Your preference may depend on whether you value deep contrast or a larger screen area.
Resolution
Screen size
Screen type
Galaxy J3 (2016) vs Nokia 2.4 camera
Camera quality matters for capturing photos and video calls. The front and main cameras differ in resolution, influencing image detail and clarity.
Front Camera
The Galaxy J3 (2016) has a 2 megapixel front camera suited for basic selfies and video chats. The Nokia 2.4 features a 5 megapixel front camera, which captures more detail and sharper images, ideal if you take a lot of selfies or use video calls frequently.
Main Camera
The main camera on the Galaxy J3 (2016) is 8 megapixels, which is good for everyday photography. The Nokia 2.4 has a 13 megapixel main camera, providing higher resolution photos that capture finer detail. This benefits users who want clearer and more detailed pictures.
Front camera
Main camera
Galaxy J3 (2016) vs Nokia 2.4 size and design
Various practical features affect ease of use and device handling. The two phones differ in size, weight, SIM options, and storage capacities.
Physical Size And Weight
The Galaxy J3 (2016) is smaller and lighter, measuring 142.3 mm in height, 71 mm in width, and weighing 138 g, making it easier to hold and carry. The Nokia 2.4 is taller and wider at 165.9 mm by 76.3 mm and weighs 195 g, which may suit users who prefer a larger feel and don't mind a heavier device.
SIM Card Options
The Galaxy J3 (2016) supports a single physical SIM card, suitable for users with one mobile number. The Nokia 2.4 has dual physical SIM slots, which is convenient if you need to use two numbers or carriers on one phone.
Storage Options
The Galaxy J3 (2016) comes with either 8GB or 16GB storage options, which works well for everyday apps and media. The Nokia 2.4 offers larger storage choices of 32GB or 64GB, better suited for users who store more photos, videos, or apps.
Connector And Audio Jack
Both phones use Micro-USB connectors and include a 3.5mm headphone jack, so your existing accessories will work with either device.
Network Compatibility
Both phones support 4G mobile networks and are unlocked, allowing you to use them with a wide range of carriers.
Carrier compatibility
Connector
Depth
Height
Mobile network
SD card slot
SIM card
Weight
Width
Galaxy J3 (2016) or Nokia 2.4: which should you buy?
Buy the Galaxy J3 (2016) if
- you want to spend less: it starts at £48, £45 less than the Nokia 2.4
- you want an OLED screen
- you want a lighter build (138 g vs 195 g)
Buy the Nokia 2.4 if
- you want a bigger battery (4500 mAh vs 2600 mAh)
- you want a higher-resolution main camera (13 megapixels vs 8 megapixels)
- you want a higher-resolution front camera (5 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
What our customers say
Customers who bought the Galaxy J3 (2016) often comment on the phone's condition, with many saying it looks like new or better than expected. Some users mention smooth operation and solid battery life. A few customers had issues registering their SIM or connecting to the network, but most reviews highlight satisfaction with the phone working well for everyday use. The size and screen have been appreciated for being compact and clear.
For the Nokia 2.4, customers appreciate the phone for its larger screen and storage capacity. Some say it is fantastic and they love it, although a few note occasional slowdowns. There are positive remarks about the value, with one customer unsure about the exact storage size received but generally happy. The phone suits users who want a larger device with better camera resolution.
Both phones attract buyers with different priorities: the Galaxy J3 (2016) suits those who prefer a smaller, straightforward device, while the Nokia 2.4 appeals to people wanting a bigger screen and more storage for media and apps.
Galaxy J3 (2016) vs Nokia 2.4 FAQs
Galaxy J3 (2016) vs Nokia 2.4 comes down to the battery, screen size and screen type. The Nokia 2.4 has a bigger battery: 4500 mAh vs 2600 mAh. Screen size: 5 inch on the Galaxy J3 (2016), 6,5 inch on the Nokia 2.4.
The Galaxy J3 (2016) is cheaper refurbished, from £48 compared with £93 for the Nokia 2.4.
The Nokia 2.4 has a bigger battery: 4500 mAh vs 2600 mAh.
The Nokia 2.4 has a higher-resolution main camera: 13 megapixels vs 8 megapixels.
Updates for the Galaxy J3 (2016) ended in Apr 2019. We don't have published update dates for the Nokia 2.4.
Refurbished, the Galaxy J3 (2016) comes in 8GB and 16GB, and the Nokia 2.4 in 32GB and 64GB.
