Galaxy A50 vs Nokia 2.4
Shop Samsung Galaxy
Galaxy A50
Starting at
£92.35£349.00 new
Nokia 2.4
Starting at
£93.00What's the difference between the Galaxy A50 and Nokia 2.4?
Galaxy A50 vs Nokia 2.4 comes down to the chipset, RAM and battery. Refurbished, the Galaxy A50 starts at £92.35, £0.65 less than the Nokia 2.4. The Nokia 2.4 is the newer model, released in 2020.
Refurbished from
Chipset
RAM
Battery
Screen size
Screen type
- Chipset: Exynos 9610 (10 nm) on the Galaxy A50, Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 (12 nm) on the Nokia 2.4.
- The Galaxy A50 has more RAM: 4 GB vs 2 GB.
- The Nokia 2.4 has a bigger battery: 4500 mAh vs 4000 mAh.
Galaxy A50 vs Nokia 2.4 specs
The Galaxy A50 and Nokia 2.4 offer distinct experiences suited to different needs. The Galaxy A50 has a sharper and more vibrant Super AMOLED screen with higher resolution and more RAM, making it better for multitasking and detailed viewing. It also has higher megapixel cameras for clearer photos. The Nokia 2.4 has a larger battery and supports dual physical SIM cards, which suits users wanting longer battery life and managing two phone numbers. It features a bigger but less sharp IPS LCD screen and charging with microUSB. Both run Android and come unlocked with expandable storage. Choose the Galaxy A50 for stronger performance and camera clarity. Pick the Nokia 2.4 if battery endurance and dual SIM support matter more to you.
Galaxy A50 vs Nokia 2.4 price
Colour
- PurpleSold out
- GreySold out
Storage
- 32GBSold out
- 64GBSold out
Galaxy A50 vs Nokia 2.4 battery life and software updates
Durability covers battery capacity, software updates, and device robustness. Both devices run Android. Battery size and software support differ, which affects daily use and longevity.
Battery Capacity
The Nokia 2.4 has a 4500 mAh battery, larger than the Galaxy A50's 4000 mAh. This means the Nokia 2.4 can offer longer usage between charges, which benefits users needing extended battery life for long days or travel. The Galaxy A50's battery is still solid for typical daily use but may require more frequent charging.
Software Updates
This means both phones will run versions from their release period.
Battery
Fast charging
Foldable
Software updates
Year of release
Galaxy A50 vs Nokia 2.4 performance
Performance depends on the chipset, RAM, and storage options. These affect how smoothly apps run, multitasking ability, and available space for files and apps.
Processor and RAM
The Galaxy A50 uses the Exynos 9610 chipset with 4 GB of RAM, while the Nokia 2.4 has a Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 chipset and 2 GB of RAM. More RAM in the Galaxy A50 means it can keep more apps open and handle multitasking more smoothly. The Nokia 2.4 suits everyday use and lighter multitasking.
Storage Variants
The Galaxy A50 is available with 64 GB or 128 GB of storage, offering more space for apps, photos, and files. The Nokia 2.4 comes with 32 GB or 64 GB options, which fits basic storage needs but may require more frequent management of files or use of an SD card.
Chipset
RAM
Galaxy A50 vs Nokia 2.4 screen
Screen quality influences how you view photos, videos, and apps. Resolution, size, and screen type affect sharpness, colour, and viewing comfort.
Resolution and Screen Type
The Galaxy A50 features a 1080 x 2340 Super AMOLED screen, delivering sharper detail and more vibrant colours. The Nokia 2.4 has a 720 x 1600 IPS LCD screen, which is less sharp but still clear. The Galaxy A50 suits users valuing image quality and deeper colours.
Screen Size
The Nokia 2.4 has a slightly larger 6.5 inch screen compared to the Galaxy A50's 6.4 inch screen. This extra size gives more room for video or reading, which some users might find more comfortable despite the lower resolution.
Resolution
Screen size
Screen type
Galaxy A50 vs Nokia 2.4 camera
Audiovisual features centre on camera quality, affecting photo and video detail for selfies and main shots.
Front Camera Resolution
The Galaxy A50 has a 25 megapixel front camera, which captures more detail for selfies and video calls. The Nokia 2.4's 5 megapixel front camera suits everyday video chatting and basic selfies.
Main Camera Resolution
For main photos, the Galaxy A50 offers a 25 megapixel camera that captures finer details. The Nokia 2.4 provides a 13 megapixel main camera, which is suitable for casual photography and everyday snapshots.
Camera type
Front camera
Main camera
Galaxy A50 vs Nokia 2.4 size and design
This section covers connectivity, size, weight, and other practical features that affect everyday handling and use.
SIM Card Options
The Nokia 2.4 supports dual physical SIM cards, ideal for users who manage two phone numbers on one device. The Galaxy A50 offers a single physical SIM, fitting users with one mobile line.
Connector Types
The Galaxy A50 uses USB-C alongside a 3.5mm headphone jack, offering a modern charging and accessory connection. The Nokia 2.4 uses microUSB with a 3.5mm jack, which suits users with older cables or accessories.
Size and Weight
The Nokia 2.4 is larger and heavier, measuring 165.9 mm by 76.3 mm and weighing 195 g, which provides a bigger screen but a steadier hand might be needed. The Galaxy A50 is more compact and lighter at 158.5 mm by 74.7 mm and 166 g, making it easier to hold for long periods.
Carrier compatibility
Connector
Depth
Height
Mobile network
SD card slot
SIM card
Weight
Width
Galaxy A50 or Nokia 2.4: which should you buy?
Buy the Galaxy A50 if
- you want to spend less: it starts at £92.35, £0.65 less than the Nokia 2.4
- you want more RAM (4 GB vs 2 GB)
- you want an OLED screen
Buy the Nokia 2.4 if
- you want a bigger battery (4500 mAh vs 4000 mAh)
- you want the newer model (2020)
What our customers say
Customers who bought the Galaxy A50 appreciate its storage capacity, with options up to 128 GB that meet their needs well. Many are pleased with the phone's solid battery life, able to last through a full day. The camera quality and overall phone feel are also highlighted positively. Some mention minor battery life concerns but still find the device reliable and recommend it. The Galaxy A50 appeals to users wanting a well-rounded phone with good speed and a vibrant screen.
For the Nokia 2.4, customers value its reliability and affordability. Some mention the phone runs slower at times, reflecting its performance suited to everyday tasks. The battery life is praised indirectly by the device's larger capacity. Users who want a straightforward phone with dual SIM support find it useful. Storage variations cause some questions but the overall impression is positive for basic use.
In summary, the Galaxy A50 fits those wanting more power, better cameras, and sharper display, while the Nokia 2.4 is suited to users prioritising battery life and dual SIM functionality for everyday needs.
Galaxy A50 vs Nokia 2.4 FAQs
Galaxy A50 vs Nokia 2.4 comes down to the chipset, RAM and battery. Chipset: Exynos 9610 (10 nm) on the Galaxy A50, Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 (12 nm) on the Nokia 2.4. The Galaxy A50 has more RAM: 4 GB vs 2 GB.
The Galaxy A50 is cheaper refurbished, from £92.35 compared with £93 for the Nokia 2.4.
The Nokia 2.4 has a bigger battery: 4500 mAh vs 4000 mAh.
The Galaxy A50 has a higher-resolution main camera: 25 megapixels vs 13 megapixels.
Updates for the Galaxy A50 ended in Apr 2023. We don't have published update dates for the Nokia 2.4.
Refurbished, the Galaxy A50 comes in 64GB and 128GB, and the Nokia 2.4 in 32GB and 64GB.
