Galaxy A40 vs Nokia 2.4
Shop Samsung Galaxy
Galaxy A40
Starting at
£71.42£229.00 new
Nokia 2.4
Starting at
£93.00What's the difference between the Galaxy A40 and Nokia 2.4?
Galaxy A40 vs Nokia 2.4 comes down to the chipset, RAM and battery. Refurbished, the Galaxy A40 starts at £71.42, £21.58 less than the Nokia 2.4. The Nokia 2.4 is the newer model, released in 2020.
Refurbished from
Chipset
RAM
Battery
Screen size
Screen type
- Chipset: Exynos 7904 on the Galaxy A40, Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 (12 nm) on the Nokia 2.4.
- The Galaxy A40 has more RAM: 4 GB vs 2 GB.
- The Nokia 2.4 has a bigger battery: 4500 mAh vs 3100 mAh.
Galaxy A40 vs Nokia 2.4 specs
The Galaxy A40 and Nokia 2.4 differ in several key areas that suit different needs. The Galaxy A40 has a smaller but sharper and more vivid Super AMOLED screen, higher RAM for smoother multitasking, and more detailed front and main cameras. It is lighter and slimmer, making it easier to carry and handle. The Nokia 2.4 offers a larger screen for more viewing space, a bigger battery for longer use between charges, and comes in storage options of 32GB or 64GB. It is heavier and thicker, which may suit those who prefer a larger device with longer battery life.
Galaxy A40 vs Nokia 2.4 price
Colour
- PurpleSold out
- GreySold out
Storage
- 32GBSold out
- 64GBSold out
Galaxy A40 vs Nokia 2.4 battery life and software updates
Durability covers battery size, software updates, and basic build details that affect how long the phones can last on a charge and stay current.
Battery Capacity
The Nokia 2.4 has a 4500 mAh battery, which means it can typically last longer between charges. This suits users who value extended battery life for all-day use. The Galaxy A40 has a 3100 mAh battery, which may require more frequent charging but supports a lighter and slimmer design.
Operating System
This means both phones continue to offer a familiar Android experience without the newest system features.
Battery
Fast charging
Foldable
Software updates
Year of release
Galaxy A40 vs Nokia 2.4 performance
Performance depends on the chipset, RAM, and storage, influencing how smoothly the phone runs apps and manages multitasking.
RAM Size
The Galaxy A40 has 4 GB of RAM, allowing it to keep more apps open and handle multitasking more smoothly. This suits users who switch between several apps or use more demanding applications. The Nokia 2.4 has 2 GB of RAM, which is suitable for everyday use and simpler app routines.
Chipset
The Galaxy A40 uses the Exynos 7904 chipset, while the Nokia 2.4 uses the Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 (12 nm). Both chipsets support general smartphone tasks, but the difference in RAM size is likely more noticeable for day-to-day performance.
Storage Options
The Galaxy A40 comes with 64 GB storage, providing ample space for apps, photos, and media. The Nokia 2.4 is available with either 32 GB or 64 GB, giving you a choice depending on your storage needs.
Chipset
RAM
Galaxy A40 vs Nokia 2.4 screen
Screen quality affects how clear, bright, and large the display looks for media, browsing, and general use.
Screen Size
The Nokia 2.4 has a larger 6.5 inch screen, which offers more room for videos, browsing, and reading. This suits users who prefer a bigger display for content consumption. The Galaxy A40 has a 5.9 inch screen, which is easier to handle with one hand and fits more comfortably in smaller pockets.
Screen Resolution and Type
The Galaxy A40 features a 1080 x 2340 resolution Super AMOLED screen, producing sharper images and more vibrant colours. This makes it well suited for users who prioritise screen clarity and contrast. The Nokia 2.4 has a 720 x 1600 IPS LCD screen, which provides natural colour and good viewing angles but with less sharpness.
Resolution
Screen size
Screen type
Galaxy A40 vs Nokia 2.4 camera
Camera quality matters for capturing photos and selfies, with megapixels being one aspect of the detail the camera can capture.
Front Camera
The Galaxy A40 has a 25 megapixel front camera, ideal for detailed selfies and video calls. This suits users who value high-resolution front-facing photos. The Nokia 2.4 comes with a 5 megapixel front camera, suitable for everyday use and basic selfies.
Main Camera
The Galaxy A40 has a 16 megapixel main camera, capable of capturing detailed photos. The Nokia 2.4 has a 13 megapixel main camera, which is good for general photography needs. Both cameras serve well for casual photo use.
Camera type
Front camera
Main camera
Galaxy A40 vs Nokia 2.4 size and design
Miscellaneous features include physical size, weight, ports, and connectivity, which affect everyday usability and convenience.
Physical Size and Weight
The Galaxy A40 is slimmer and lighter at 7.9 mm depth and 140 g, making it easier to carry and hold. The Nokia 2.4 is thicker and heavier at 8.7 mm depth and 195 g, which some users may prefer for a more substantial feel.
Charging and Headphone Ports
The Galaxy A40 uses USB-C plus a 3.5 mm headphone jack, which supports modern charging and wired audio connections. The Nokia 2.4 uses microUSB plus a 3.5 mm jack, providing compatibility with older accessories.
Carrier and SIM
Both phones are unlocked and support Dual Physical SIM cards, allowing flexibility for using two numbers or carriers. Both operate on 4G networks.
Expandable Storage
Both phones support microSDXC cards, so you can add extra storage for media and files beyond the built-in capacity.
Carrier compatibility
Connector
Depth
Height
Mobile network
SD card slot
SIM card
Weight
Width
Galaxy A40 or Nokia 2.4: which should you buy?
Buy the Galaxy A40 if
- you want to spend less: it starts at £71.42, £21.58 less than the Nokia 2.4
- you want more RAM (4 GB vs 2 GB)
- you want an OLED screen
Buy the Nokia 2.4 if
- you want a bigger battery (4500 mAh vs 3100 mAh)
- you want the newer model (2020)
What our customers say
Customers who bought the Galaxy A40 report that the phone often looks like new and performs well. Many mention being happy with the size and weight, finding it fits comfortably in pockets and hands. Its screen and camera quality receive positive notes, with users appreciating the detailed front camera. Some customers have bought it as a replacement phone and are pleased with its condition and usability. There is a range of satisfaction from excellent to good, with only one report of a non-working device needing repair.
Users of the Nokia 2.4 often praise it for delivering good service and value. Some mention the phone runs slow at times, which aligns with the lower RAM. Others are happy with the phone's performance for everyday use and are impressed by it overall. Storage options raise questions for some customers about capacity, indicating interest in the 32 GB or 64 GB variants. The larger screen and longer battery life attract users looking for a phone suited to extended use.
The Galaxy A40 suits those wanting a lighter phone with a sharper screen and higher RAM for smoother multitasking and better cameras. The Nokia 2.4 fits buyers who prefer a larger display and longer battery life, with simpler performance for everyday tasks.
Galaxy A40 vs Nokia 2.4 FAQs
Galaxy A40 vs Nokia 2.4 comes down to the chipset, RAM and battery. Chipset: Exynos 7904 on the Galaxy A40, Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 (12 nm) on the Nokia 2.4. The Galaxy A40 has more RAM: 4 GB vs 2 GB.
The Galaxy A40 is cheaper refurbished, from £71.42 compared with £93 for the Nokia 2.4.
The Nokia 2.4 has a bigger battery: 4500 mAh vs 3100 mAh.
The Galaxy A40 has a higher-resolution main camera: 16 megapixels vs 13 megapixels.
The Galaxy A40 no longer gets updates. We don't have published update dates for the Nokia 2.4.
Refurbished, the Galaxy A40 comes in 64GB, and the Nokia 2.4 in 32GB and 64GB.
